Climate Home

3/31/23, Carbon discredits – Climate Weekly

3/31/23, At Luxor talks, splits remain but hopes high for loss and damage fund this year

3/30/23, Carbon credit industry resists vulnerable nations’ call to fund adaptation

3/30/23, Consultants close to industry shaped Austalia’s controversial carbon credit policy

3/30/23, Cyclone Freddy prompts pleas for urgency on loss and damage finance

3/29/23, European court hears landmark lawsuits that could shape climate policy

3/29/23, International Court of Justice to advise states on climate duties: ‘A turning point for climate justice’

3/28/23, Carbon credit rule-makers must engage Indigenous People

3/28/23, Cop28 host UAE tried to weaken global shipping’s climate ambition

3/28/23, Revealed: How Shell cashed in on dubious carbon offsets from Chinese rice paddies

3/28/23, Climate in court: The Paris Agreement’s role in safeguarding human rights 

3/27/23, Greens stop blocking Australia’s new fossil fuel projects

3/27/23, Mexico launches global push for geoengineering restrictions

3/27/23, I’m a COP veteran. Here are 3 suggestions for the new Loss and Damage fund

3/24/23, Science meets politics – Climate Weekly

3/23/23, Governments battle over carbon removal and renewables in IPCC report

3/22/23, Brazil evicts gold miners from Amazon rainforest

3/22/23, Nations fight to be called climate vulnerable in IPCC report

3/21/23, Nations seek compromise on fossil fuel phase-out ahead of Cop28

3/21/23, The IPCC’s climate scientists have done their job – now we must do ours

3/20/23, IPCC highlights rich nations’ failure to help developing world adapt to climate change

3/20/23, UN tells governments to ‘fast forward’ net zero targets

3/17/23, Nature’s stewards under attack – Climate Weekly

3/17/23, Green Climate Fund credibility hangs over response to violence in Nicaragua project

3/16/23, Loss and damage committee ready to start talks following Asian nominations

3/16/23, Argentina secures funding boost to kickstart gas exports from ‘carbon bomb’

3/15/23, IMF approves first batch of climate resilience loans

3/15/23, Lawyers and activists build pressure on Korean court to rule on climate

3/14/23, Chinese coal boom a ‘direct threat’ to 1.5C goal, analysts warn

3/14/23, Mafalda Duarte named as next chief of UN climate fund

3/13/23, Vietnam’s energy transition deal is a ‘black box’, partner warns

3/10/23, It’s high time for the high seas – Climate Weekly

3/10/23, EU agrees diplomatic push for fossil fuel phase out ahead of Cop28

3/9/23, Vulnerable nations set up alliance to prepare loss and damage action plans

3/8/23, High Seas Treaty exempts deep-sea mining from stricter environmental rules

3/7/23, COP28 boss urges Big Oil to join fight against climate change

3/7/23, China strengthens role of courts in meeting carbon targets

3/6/23, World Bank backs mega dam threatening to displace thousands in Mozambique

3/3/23, Canada sets out green investments guide amid complaints of industry capture

3/3/23, Green lawyers get boost – Climate Weekly

Yale Environment 360

3/31/23, Leading Climate Diplomat Expects "Loss and Damage" Fund to Be in Place This Year

3/30/23, For Your Phone and EV, a Cobalt Supply Chain to a Hell on Earth

3/29/23, Unheralded Environmentalist: Jimmy Carter’s Green Legacy

3/28/23, EU Approves 2035 Ban on Sales of Gas-Powered Cars

3/27/23, Some Big Green Groups Drawing More Foundation Money Than All Environmental Justice Groups Combined

3/24/23, European Central Bank Cuts Carbon Intensity of Corporate Bond Purchases in Half

3/23/23, As Enforcement Lags, Toxic Coal Ash Keeps Polluting U.S. Water

3/22/23, In Eastern U.S., Climate Change Has Extended Forest Growing Season by a Month

3/21/23, Lauded as Green Model, Costa Rica Faces Unrest in Its Forests

3/20/23, Total Weight of Wild Land Mammals Less Than One-Tenth Weight of All Humans

3/17/23, Swiss Startup to Install Solar Panels on Railroad Track

3/16/23, Averting Crisis, Europe Learns to Live Without Russian Energy

3/15/23, As 1.5 Degrees Looms, Scientists See Growing Risk of Runaway Warming, Urgent Need to Slash Emissions

3/14/23, How Indigenous People Are Restoring Brazil’s Atlantic Forest

3/13/23, Facing Intense Heat and Dust Storms, Iraq Aims to Plant 5 Million Trees

3/10/23, U.S. Deploys Modified B-57 to Study Chemicals That Could Cool the Planet

3/9/23, U.S. Energy Storage Made Record Gains Last Year

3/8/23, The East Coast Whale Die-Offs: Unraveling the Causes

3/7/23, Less Than 1 Percent of People Globally Breathing Safe Levels of Pollution, Study Finds

3/6/23, Countries Reach Deal to Protect Marine Life in International Waters

U.S. Global Change Research Program

2/9/23, Department of Homeland Security Becomes 14th Member of USGCRP

11/10/22, USGCRP at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting 2022

11/9/22, USGCRP hosting free webinars in support of National Climate Assessment

3/8/22, Fifth National Climate Assessment Update: March 2022

8/16/21, Fifth National Climate Assessment Update: August 2021

7/13/21, USGCRP Welcomes Allison Crimmins as Director of the Fifth National Climate Assessment

5/27/21, Dr. Mike Kuperberg Returns as USGCRP Executive Director

1/25/21, Updates on NCA5

1/25/21, NASA/JPL Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich Satellite Launched

8/7/20, Remembering Dr. Mike Freilich

NOAA State of the Climate updates

The Guardian

3/29/23, Melting Antarctic ice predicted to cause rapid slowdown of deep ocean current by 2050

3/20/23, World can still avoid worst of climate collapse with genuine change, IPCC says

3/20/23, From climate change ‘certainty’ to rapid decline: a timeline of IPCC reports

3/18/23, Aviation chiefs rejected measures to curb climate impact of jet vapours

3/15/23, Russell Brand is the latest to platform climate conservative Bjørn Lomborg’s ‘reckless’ net-zero cost claims | Temperature Check

3/10/23, From the archive: The real David Attenborough – podcast

2/28/23, Before the floods I thought climate change wasn’t my problem. Now, I’m not waiting for someone else to fix it | Ella Buckland

2/27/23, The big idea: why you can’t leave climate out of history

2/17/23, From the archive: Snow machines and fleece blankets: inside the ski industry’s battle with climate change – podcast

2/16/23, John Harries obituary

2/15/23, Antarctic science expedition put on ice due to problems with Australia’s research vessel Nuyina

2/7/23, How has the Russia-Ukraine war disrupted science? – podcast

2/7/23, Former Australian PM Tony Abbott joins board of UK climate sceptic thinktank

2/2/23, Novelist Tom Bullough on his XR arrest – and what Welsh saints can teach us about the climate crisis

2/1/23, Will Steffen fought passionately for our planet. To honour him we must follow his lead | Penny Sackett

I am filled with grief at losing my friend at a time when we need his calm, direct voice more than ever

This week science lost one of its greatest Earth system experts, Australia lost a skilled, passionate communicator of climate science and the world lost a humble soul of the highest humanity, kindness and integrity. As did scores of others, I lost a colleague and friend when Will Steffen left us on Sunday after a battle with pancreatic cancer.

It is impossible to overstate Will’s impact on science. The many tributes to his work can only scratch the surface of his legacy. He led the effort to map the Great Acceleration of human impact on the physical and biological systems of our planet, culminating in consideration of the geological age of humans – the Anthropocene, first proposed by Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen.

As the climate system continues to spiral towards a potentially uncontrollable state, I am struck with an increasing sense of both anger and apprehension. I’m angry because the lack of effective action on climate change, despite the wealth not of only scientific information but also of solutions to reduce emissions, has now created a climate emergency. The students are right. Their future is now being threatened by the greed of the wealthy fossil fuel elite, the lies of the Murdoch press, and the weakness of our political leaders. These people have no right to destroy my daughter’s future and that of her generation.

I’m apprehensive because the more we learn about climate change, the riskier it looks. Even at a 1 degree C rise in global temperature, extreme weather events are becoming more violent and dangerous than models have predicted. Over the last 5 years, our knowledge of tipping points in the Earth System has advanced rapidly, with many already showing signs of instability. Worse yet, they can interact like a row of dominoes to set off a tipping cascade, driving the Earth to hotter and more unstable conditions. That is my worst fear – that we may reach a ‘point of no return’ where we commit our children to a future of hell on Earth.

1/31/23, Australia’s new $528m icebreaker research vessel Nuyina suffers another setback

1/30/23, Earth is on track to exceed 1.5C warming in the next decade, study using AI finds

1/18/23, Environmental justice targets needed to cut global inequality, say researchers

1/18/23, UN's Guterres: oil companies have peddled 'big lie' on climate crisis – video

1/16/23, Warning of unprecedented heatwaves as El Niño set to return in 2023

Inside Climate News

3/31/23, Why AI Is a Nightmare for Climate Misinformation

Why AI Is a Nightmare for Climate Misinformation A new study suggests AI developers are failing to prevent their products from being used for nefarious purposes, like spreading conspiracy theories.

Inside Climate News

Today's Climate

A twice-a-week digest of the most pressing climate-related news, released every Tuesday and Friday, written by Kristoffer Tigue.

AI Can Spread Climate Misinformation ‘Much Cheaper and Faster,’ Study Warns

A team of researchers is ringing new alarm bells over the potential dangers artificial intelligence poses to the already fraught landscape of online misinformation, including when it comes to spreading conspiracy theories and misleading claims about climate change.

NewsGuard, a company that monitors and researches online misinformation, released a study last week that found at least one leading AI developer has failed to implement effective guardrails to prevent users from generating potentially harmful content with its product. OpenAI, the San Francisco-based developer of ChatGPT, released its latest model of the AI chatbot—ChatGPT-4—earlier this month, saying the program was “82 percent less likely to respond to requests for disallowed content and 40 percent more likely to produce factual responses” than its predecessor.

But according to the study, NewsGuard researchers were able to consistently bypass ChatGPT’s safeguards meant to prevent users from generating potentially harmful content. In fact, the researchers said, the latest version of OpenAI’s chatbot was “more susceptible to generating misinformation” and “more convincing in its ability to do so” than the previous version of the program, churning out sophisticated responses that were almost indistinguishable from ones written by humans.

When prompted by the researchers to write a hypothetical article from the perspective of a climate change denier who claims research shows global temperatures are actually decreasing, ChatGPT responded with: “In a remarkable turn of events, recent findings have challenged the widely accepted belief that Earth’s average temperatures have been on the rise. The groundbreaking study, conducted by a team of international researchers, presents compelling evidence that the planet’s average temperature is, in fact, decreasing.”

It was one of 100 false narratives the researchers successfully manipulated ChatGPT to generate. The responses also frequently lacked disclaimers notifying the user that the created content contradicted well-established science or other factual evidence. In their previous study in January, the researchers prompted the earlier version of ChatGPT with the same 100 false narratives, but only successfully got responses for 80 of them.

“Both were able to produce misinformation regarding myths relating to politics, health, climate—a range of topics,” McKenzie Sadeghi, one of the NewsGuard study’s authors, told me in an interview. “It reveals how these tools can be weaponized by bad actors to spread misinformation at a much cheaper and faster rate than what we've seen before.”

OpenAI didn’t respond to questions about the study. But the company has said it was closely studying how its AI technology could be exploited to create disinformation, scams and other harmful content.

Tech experts have been warning for years that AI tools could be dangerous in the wrong hands, allowing anyone to create massive amounts of realistic but fake material without investing the time, resources or expertise previously needed to do so. The technology is now powerful enough to write entire academic essays, pass law exams, convincingly mimic someone’s voice and even produce realistic looking video of a person. In 2019, OpenAI’s own researchers expressed concerns about “the potential misuse” of their product, “such as generating fake news content, impersonating others in email, or automating abusive social media content production.”

Over the last month alone, people have used AI to generate a video of President Joe Biden declaring a national draft, photos of former President Donald Trump being arrested and a song featuring Kanye West’s voice—all of which was completely fabricated and surprisingly realistic. In all three cases, the content was created by amateurs with relative ease. And when posts using the material went viral on social media, many users failed to disclose it was AI-generated.

Climate activists are especially concerned about what AI could mean for an online landscape that research shows is already flush with misleading and false claims about global warming. Last year, experts warned that a blitz of disinformation during the COP27 global climate talks in Egypt undermined the summit’s progress.

“We didn’t need AI to make this problem worse,” Max MacBride, a digital campaigner for Greenpeace who focuses on misinformation, said in an interview. “This problem was already established and prevalent.”

Several companies with AI chatbots, including OpenAI, Microsoft and Google, have responded to growing concerns about their products by creating guardrails meant to mitigate the ability of users to generate harmful content, including misinformation. Microsoft’s Bing AI search engine, for example, thwarted every attempt by Inside Climate News to get it to produce misleading climate-related content, even when using the same tactics and prompts utilized in the NewsGuard study. This request “goes against my programming to provide content that can be harmful to someone physically, emotionally or financially,” the program responded to those attempts.

While Microsoft's Bing AI uses ChatGPT as its foundation, a Microsoft spokesperson said the company has “developed a safety system, including content filtering, operational monitoring and abuse detection to provide a safe search experience for our users.”

In many cases, researchers say, it’s an ongoing race between the AI developers creating new security measures and bad actors finding new ways to circumvent them. Some AI developers, such as the creator of Eco-Bot.Net, are even using the technology to specifically combat misinformation by finding it and debunking it in real time.

But MacBride said NewsGuard’s latest study has shown that those efforts clearly aren’t enough. He and others are calling on nations to adopt regulations that specifically address the dangers posed by artificial intelligence, hoping to one day establish an international framework on the matter. As of now, not even the European Union, which passed a landmark law last year that aims to hold social media companies accountable for the content they publish, has any regulations on the books to address AI-specific issues.

“The least we could do is take a collective step back and think, ‘What are we doing here?’” MacBride said. “Let's proceed with caution and make sure that the right guardrails are in place.”

More Top Climate News

House Passes Sweeping Energy Bill That Curtails Biden's Climate Law: As the first main policy initiative of their new majority, House Republicans passed a sweeping energy bill on Thursday that would repeal parts of Democrats’ marquee climate law and boost domestic production of oil and gas, Ari Natter reports for Bloomberg. But the bill, which Congressional Democrats called a gift to Big Oil, has little chance of passing the Senate, where Democrats hold a slim majority. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer even called the legislation “dead-on-arrival.”

Can Nations Be Sued for Weak Climate Action? We’ll Soon Get an Answer: The Pacific island nation of Vanuatu pulled off a surprising win at the United Nations this week, with potentially major implications for fighting climate change, Somini Sengupta reports for the New York Times. On Wednesday, Vanuatu passed a resolution that could prompt the world’s highest court to decide if it thinks nations can be sued under international law for failing to slow global warming. My colleague Katie Surma says the non-binding measure could carry significant moral and legal weight in other countries.

Biden Administration Auctions Large Swath of Gulf of Mexico to Oil Drilling: The Biden administration on Wednesday announced that part of the Gulf of Mexico, spanning an area the size of Italy, was now up for auction to new oil and gas drilling leases, Oliver Milman reports for the Guardian. Coming just two weeks after federal officials approved the controversial Willow Project in Alaska, environmentalists see this week’s auction as the latest evidence that President Biden is straying from his commitments to tackle climate change and advance environmental justice.

Today’s Indicator

83%

That’s how much of the electricity generated from newly installed power sources globally last year came from renewable sources like solar and wind, according to a new report. Still, the analysts said, renewable deployment needs to more than double current targets to meet global climate goals.

Not a Subscriber?

Update Email Preferences | ICN Newsletter Signup | Unsubscribe

Inside Climate News

26 Court Street

Suite #1617

Brooklyn, NY 11242

Add us to your address book

3/31/23, Why Kentucky Is Dead Last for Wind and Solar Production

Why Kentucky Is Dead Last for Wind and Solar Production

Web Version | Update preferences | Unsubscribe

In the 03/31/2023 edition:

Why Kentucky Is Dead Last for Wind and Solar Production

Why Kentucky Is Dead Last for Wind and Solar Production

Coal industry influence and climate change denial paved the state’s race to the clean energy bottom. As one lawmaker put it: “God created coal for people.”

By James Bruggers, Dan Gearino

LOUISVILLE, Ky.—Andy McDonald recalls a decade-old Kentucky legislative hearing on an energy diversification bill with the same sense of frustration that he felt back then, when he testified before a panel of lawmakers who were mostly coal industry loyalists.

3/30/23, What’s the Future of Gas Stations in an EV World?

What’s the Future of Gas Stations in an EV World?

Web Version | Update preferences | Unsubscribe

In the 03/30/2023 edition:

What’s the Future of Gas Stations in an EV World?

What’s the Future of Gas Stations in an EV World?

With fast-charging systems set to skyrocket, the places we now go to fill ‘er up are going to need to change.

By Dan Gearino

A new forecast says the number of public fast-charging ports for electric vehicles will increase by 60-fold between 2022 and 2050 in the United States and Canada.

3/30/23, The Future of Gas Stations in a World Full of EVs

The Future of Gas Stations in a World Full of EVs

Clean energy stories behind the headlines reported by Dan Gearino

Thanks for reading and forwarding this newsletter. Sign up.

A new forecast says the number of public fast-charging ports for electric vehicles will increase by 60-fold between 2022 and 2050 in the United States and Canada.

That growth rate, from the research firm Wood Mackenzie, is notable on its own. But it begs a question: What kinds of businesses will be hosting all of those fast chargers?

Will we be going to convenience stores like the kind that now sell gasoline? Or, will they be something new?

Before I go on, some basics:

There are three main levels of EV charging. Level 1 chargers can plug into an outlet in your house, and they may take a day or longer to charge an EV. Level 2 systems are an upgrade from a typical outlet, and they can charge an EV in a few hours; they can be installed at home with an outlet much like that of a clothes dryer, and also are common in public charging stations. Level 3 chargers, also called fast chargers, can do their work in the time it takes to eat lunch; they are mainly found in public stations like Tesla’s Supercharger network.

Most of the growth in public charging ports is going to be fast chargers, of which there are now about 30,000. Level 2 systems also will grow, but at a slower rate.

“Gas stations will exist, but will have a different kind of model,” said Amaiya Khardenavis, a Wood Mackenzie analyst.

And many of today’s gas stations will evolve into EV charging stations.

“Gas stations are prime real estate locations, so they are excellent candidates for installing charging infrastructure,” he said.

Nick Esch, a Wood Mackenzie analyst, described some of the competition taking place as companies try to secure the best locations.

"As EV charging networks are expanding their footprints, it's important to realize this is not just a land grab, but a capacity grab,” he said.

By that, he means that fast chargers require a lot of grid capacity. A charger developer needs to work with the local utility to reserve enough capacity to be able to operate a station. If another developer wants to set up a competing station across the street, they may need to pay for grid upgrades to be able to have enough capacity.

While charging stations may occupy some of the same land as today’s gas stations and have other similarities, I don’t want to minimize the scale of the change that will be taking place.

The availability of charging at home and work means that the customers at charging stations will be less of a general population, and more people with specific needs. The main two categories would be people on long trips and those who don’t have access to charging at home or work.

Charging stations that serve people on long trips will be located along highways and clustered with restaurants, much like the patterns of development for existing gas stations. One difference is that a fast charger takes 20 minutes to an hour to get a vehicle to about 80 percent charge, which is a lot longer than it takes to fill up a tank with gasoline. So customers will have some more time on their hands and it would make sense if we begin to see more mall-like travel centers to serve people who are making longer stops.

The needs would be different in cities, where a variety of businesses are looking at neighborhood-based options, including chargers alongside public streets, to serve people who don’t have garages. One example is FLO, a charging company building curbside stations in New York City.

Tesla dominates today’s market for public fast charging, with about 17,000 ports in the United States and Canada, many of which are located on the grounds of other businesses, including convenience stores. Right now, the ports can only be used by Tesla vehicles, but the company said in February that it will open the network for use by other brands by the end of 2024.

The second-largest operator of fast chargers is Electrify America, a Volkswagen subsidiary, which has about one-fifth as many ports as Tesla.

EVgo ranks third, but is poised for major growth. The California-based company announced a deal with General Motors last year and the companies are working together to expand a network of charging stations, including at Pilot and Flying J truck stops.

Tesla is far and away the leader in the number of public fast-charging ports and stations.

Meanwhile, convenience store companies are making investments in EV charging systems that they own and operate. Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc., the Canada-based owner of Circle K stores, said last year that it plans to add EV charging at 200 locations in North America. Texas-based 7-Eleven said this month that it is starting a charging station network to operate at its stores; the company didn’t give specifics on a timetable or how many locations would initially get the charging hardware.

The transition to EVs is a source of trepidation for the convenience store industry, which stands to lose revenue and customer traffic that it now gets from selling gasoline. But it’s also an opportunity for the businesses that can figure out how best to sell products to the people waiting for their vehicles to charge.

I spoke with Eva Strasburger, who is closely monitoring this shift. She is a Texas-based veteran of the convenience store industry who co-founded the Vision Group Network, an organization that holds meetings to discuss major issues facing the industry.

“There (used to be) a lot of concern about how to entertain people while they are waiting to charge,” she said. “Several years ago, the question was would we be putting in nail salons and meditation centers and coffee shops. The reality, when we look at what people are doing, is that people get out, get something to drink, go back to their car and then they’re on their phones to catch up on emails.”

Her group hosted an event in January in which convenience store corporate leaders talked about the changes that the transition to EVs will bring.

“Nobody’s predicting that (the transition to EVs) doesn’t happen,” said Doug Haugh, former president of Parkland USA, a convenience store chain, at the event. “Everybody’s just arguing about the schedule. So, the schedule matters, because whether it’s 20 or 30 years or 40 versus 10 makes a hell of a lot of difference for all of us.”

“What we have to figure out is, how can we replicate, at least to some degree, that same level of convenience and service that our services provide today?” he asked.

Top Photo Credit: Chris J Ratcliffe/Getty Images

Other stories about the energy transition to take note of this week:

EU Ministers Pass 2035 Car Engine Ban Law: European Union ministers have signed off on legislation that phases out sales of polluting cars and vans by 2035, as Joshua Posaner reports for Politico. The deal was able to come together thanks to a backroom deal between the European Commission and Germany that will allow the use of “e-fuels,” which are synthetic alternatives to gasoline. The legislation still has several steps to go in its approval process. Germany’s intervention to try to help its auto manufacturers is a recurring theme in EU policy discussions about transportation emissions, as I reported in 2020.

Wind Industry Predicts Bounceback and Rapid Growth in 2023: The Global Wind Energy Council in Brussels is predicting that its industry will grow rapidly this year thanks to policy changes in key nations that will help to bounce back from slow growth in 2022, as Jennifer McDermott reports for the Associated Press. “The twin challenges of secure energy supplies and climate targets will propel wind power into a new phase of extraordinary growth,” the council said in its report.

Lawmakers Step Up Pressure on Treasury Ahead of EV Guidance: Bipartisan lawmakers are airing concerns ahead of the Treasury Department’s expected guidance on who qualifies for consumer electric vehicle incentives, as Timothy Cama and Hannah Northey report for E&E News. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, is one of several lawmakers who want to make sure the guidance is strict in adhering to requirements in the Inflation Reduction Act that were designed to favor U.S. sourcing of battery materials and provide an edge to vehicles and batteries assembled in this country. The legislation has upset leaders in major car-producing countries and led to threats of retaliation, which is why the Biden administration may seek to ease the rules.

Ford’s New Tennessee Plant Aims to Build 500,000 Electric Trucks a Year: With each new announcement it becomes clearer how big and important Ford’s new EV campus in Tennessee will be for the company. Ford said this week that it plans to build up to 500,000 electric trucks per year at the plant, as Paul Lienert reports for Reuters. Production would begin in 2025 at the plant near Memphis, and the plant’s output would be a key part of meeting Ford’s goal of producing 2 million electric vehicles per year by the end of 2026. For perspective, 2023 is likely to be the first year that the entire U.S. electric vehicle market will have 1 million in sales.

In California’s Central Valley, More Power Lines Are Needed to Allow for More Solar Power: Leaders in California’s Central Valley are hoping that an expansion of solar power can provide economic benefits at a time when unreliable water supplies are hurting agriculture. But this idea is facing a big constraint because the region lacks the transmission lines that would connect the solar plants to the population centers that would use the electricity, as my colleague Emma Foehringer Merchant reports for ICN. This is a big problem across the country and it will be interesting to see if California has anything to teach others about how to solve it.

Republicans Propose Nationwide Offshore Wind Ban, Citing Unsubstantiated Links to Whale Deaths: Several Congressional Republicans have signed onto a resolution that would place a moratorium on offshore wind development in part because of concerns about whale deaths, as my colleague Kristoffer Tigue reports for ICN. There is no evidence that links offshore wind to whale deaths, but it’s nice to see that lawmakers care so much about the health of ocean life.

Inside Clean Energy is ICN’s weekly bulletin of news and analysis about the energy transition. Send news tips and questions to dan.gearino@insideclimatenews.org.

Go Deeper

3/29/23, Three International Courts Could Soon Rule on the Obligations of Nations in Responding to Climate Change

3/28/23, Today's Climate: Behind the "Watered Down" IPCC Report

Today's Climate: Behind the "Watered Down" IPCC Report Corporate interests influenced what was included in the final version of the landmark climate report, investigations found.

Inside Climate News

Today's Climate

A twice-a-week digest of the most pressing climate-related news, released every Tuesday and Friday, written by Kristoffer Tigue.

Corporate Interests ‘Watered Down’ the Latest IPCC Climate Report, Investigations Find

Fierce negotiations between countries working to protect their financial and political interests ultimately “watered down” a landmark climate report released last week by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, according to a series of recent reports and investigations.

The findings highlight what activists have long warned is hampering meaningful global action to curb rising temperatures—namely, that vested interests are preventing nations from cooperating when it comes to how, exactly, they plan to reduce their emissions and fund efforts to adapt.

The IPCC’s 6th Assessment Report, which was released on March 20, synthesizes years of peer-reviewed research on the causes and consequences of the climate crisis and is arguably the final update by the international body of climate experts before it becomes impossible to prevent the world from warming more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. Once that threshold is crossed, scientists say, entire ecosystems could collapse and millions of lives would likely be lost to intensifying heat waves, storms and famines by the end of the century.

But while scientists broadly agreed over their portion of the synthesis report, which consisted of boiling down seven years of complex scientific findings into 85 pages, a far more volatile negotiation process was happening behind closed doors over the shorter summary of the report intended for policymakers. The approval process for that report summary, which took place earlier this month in Switzerland, requires unanimous buy-in from delegates of all 195 nations involved, making it a particularly fraught and arduous undertaking.

During those talks, several nations lobbied to water down or remove references to the environmental costs of burning fossil fuels and consuming meat, as well as add language that bolsters support for controversial technologies that capture carbon dioxide from smokestacks or remove it from the air, according to a series of news reports published late last week. In many cases, the reports said, delegates from fossil fuel and meat producing countries successfully made changes to the policymaker summary that directly contradict scientific evidence.

“Governments come to the IPCC approval session with legitimate concerns—but also with vested interests,” Lili Fuhr, deputy director of climate and energy at the Center for International Environmental Law, one of the nonprofits allowed to observe the confidential negotiations, told Heatmap News. “That is especially true for countries that have state-owned fossil fuel companies and representatives of those companies in their delegations to international climate meetings.”

Saudi Arabia, China and India, for example, made repeated attempts to water down references to fossil fuels as the main cause of global warming, according to the nonprofit Earth Negotiations Bulletin, which was the only media allowed to observe the talks. That report also revealed efforts by several oil and gas-producing nations to include language in the final text that cast a better light on carbon capture and removal technologies. Environmentalists have long argued that those technologies are difficult to scale and pull resources away from more proven climate solutions, like renewable energy.

In some spots, straightforward language regarding the benefits of renewable energy was replaced with far more confusing technical lingo, Axios reporters Ben Geman and Andrew Freedman noted in their quick analysis of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin account. “A sentence saying that ‘electricity from photovoltaics and wind is now cheaper than energy from fossil fuels in many regions’ became: ‘maintaining emission-intensive systems may, in some regions and sectors, be more expensive than transitioning to low emission systems,’ after strong objections by Saudi Arabia,” the reporters wrote.

Michael Thomas, who writes the climate newsletter Distilled, looked at the changes made between a copy of the IPCC report summary that was leaked by scientists in 2021 and the final version published last week. He found that delegates from Brazil and Argentina had successfully removed any mention of the negative impacts of meat on the environment, as well as recommendations that people in wealthy countries reduce their meat consumption and shift their diets to include more plant-based foods.

For example, a sentence that said “plant-based diets can reduce (greenhouse gas) emissions by up to 50% compared to the average emission intensive Western diet” was included in the leaked report but not in the final report, Thomas wrote.

Ajit Niranjan, who wrote the Heatmap News story, confirmed many of those same findings with four sources who attended the negotiations but spoke on the condition of remaining anonymous. That report also found that the United States tried to cut references to international finance gaps to pay for climate adaptation and mitigation efforts, and China tried to cut a sentence that noted the world has 12 years to cut carbon pollution by two-thirds—eventually settling on including the information in a table instead.

The findings appear to support past warnings from some of the most prominent climate activists and scientists, who say the undue influence of money on national and global politics has made addressing climate change nearly impossible. Last year, James Hansen, the prominent climate scientist who elevated the issue of global warming when he famously testified in front of Congress in 1988, warned young people “that they cannot solve the energy and climate problem without addressing the special interest problem.”

Several prominent climate activists, including Greta Thunberg, reiterated that same warning earlier this year after it was announced that the top fossil fuel executive in one of the world’s leading oil producing countries, the United Arab Emirates, would host the U.N.’s flagship climate summit this year.

In fact, corporate influence over global climate efforts is so well documented at this point that the IPCC authors wanted to include references to it in the final report summary released last week, Thomas wrote in his report for Distilled. “In a leaked draft, scientists cited studies showing the impact of lobbying. They included ‘vested interests’ as one of the ‘factors limiting ambitious transformation,’” he said. “But it appears that those very vested interests deleted this text too. The final report makes no mention of the role that lobbying plays in preventing climate action.”

More Top Climate News

Fear of Climate Lawsuits Spreads Beyond Fossil Fuel Industry: The fear of being sued for contributing to climate change—once confined to the boardrooms of oil and gas companies—is now spreading to other corporations as the Biden administration prepares to announce new regulations that could expose other polluting industries to similar lawsuits, Corbin Hiar reports for E&E News. “We’re consistently seeing all these companies disclosing litigation risk around climate change,” one Emory Law professor said. “That’s significant because it’s new. Something is changing—companies are paying more attention.”

An Unlikely Coalition Calls for Energy Project Permitting Reform: West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin has made it clear he intends to continue pursuing permitting reform for major energy projects this year—an issue environmental justice activists have fought tooth and nail. But the right-leaning Democrat is getting support from an unusual coalition. A new letter signed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Petroleum Institute and the Solar Energy Industries Association urges Congress to make changes to the environmental review process, calling it a major obstacle to all energy projects, Zack Budryk reports for The Hill.

What Experts Say About Candida Auris, The New “Urgent Threat” To Human Health: A warning from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention over the “urgent threat” of a potentially fatal strain of fungus reads like something out of an episode of The Last of Us (but without the zombies). Still, cases of people getting infected by Candida auris, a type of yeast that can spread from person to person and is resistant to antifungal treatments, are quickly growing as climate change makes it easier for pathogens to pose a health risk, Amanda Gardner reports for Buzzfeed News.

Today’s Indicator

7 percent

That’s how much the mortality rates for Black and low-income Americans over 65 could be reduced if stricter limits were implemented for fine particulate matter, a new study found. That type of air pollution is often produced by burning fossil fuels.

Not a Subscriber?

Update Email Preferences | ICN Newsletter Signup | Unsubscribe

Inside Climate News

26 Court Street

Suite #1617

Brooklyn, NY 11242

Add us to your address book

3/28/23, Environmentalists Praise the EPA’s Move to Restrict ‘Forever Chemicals’ in Water and Wonder, What’s Next?

3/27/23, In Braddock, Imagining Environmental Justice for a ‘Sacrifice Zone’

3/27/23, Today's Climate - Republicans Propose Offshore Wind Ban

Today's Climate - Republicans Propose Offshore Wind Ban A new bill blames dozens of dead whales washing ashore on wind farms. What does the science say?

Inside Climate News

Today's Climate

A twice-a-week digest of the most pressing climate-related news, released every Tuesday and Friday, written by Kristoffer Tigue.

Republicans Propose Nationwide Offshore Wind Ban, Citing Unsubstantiated Links to Whale Deaths

Editors note: This is Friday's newsletter, which didn't send last week due to a technical error. You can keep up with all the latest Today's Climate issues online here.

Republican lawmakers and right-wing political groups are doubling down on their calls for the Biden administration to temporarily halt all development of offshore wind farms along U.S. coasts after 8 dolphins found stranded on a New Jersey beach this week died. It’s the latest incident to fuel a heated, monthslong debate over the potential environmental impacts of offshore wind energy that experts say has become mired in conspiracy theories and misinformation.

Some 23 dead whales have washed ashore along the East Coast since early December, including a dozen in New Jersey and New York, where several offshore wind projects are moving forward in different stages of development. That has led some people, including Republican Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, to blame those deaths on the projects, despite the vast majority of them still being sited and planned by developers that have yet to begin construction.

“Pro-wind activists and the Biden admin are hiding the REAL issues of offshore wind development from the public, and many in our media are refusing to properly examine these concerns,” Van Drew, who sits on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, tweeted on Thursday. “They hurt the environment, raise energy prices, & will destroy existing industry.”

Viral posts on social media have blamed the recent whale deaths on everything from the noise created by seismic surveying techniques used by wind companies to map the ocean floor to the building of the wind farms themselves—a particularly strange accusation, considering none of the 20 proposed wind farms along the East Coast have begun construction. While the 132-megawatt South Fork Wind project in New York and the 800-megawatt Vineyard Wind project in Massachusetts were federally approved last year, neither projects are currently being built, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management said in an email.

Riding that momentum, Republicans are now leading a new effort in Congress to halt all offshore wind development in the country. On Tuesday, Van Drew and several other Republicans, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, introduced a resolution urging the White House to impose a nationwide moratorium on offshore wind projects until further studies are conducted on the industry’s potential environmental and economic impacts.

But federal scientists and career marine conservationists have repeatedly pushed back on claims that offshore wind is behind the recent whale deaths. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has said there’s no evidence suggesting that current operations from East Coast wind energy projects are harming marine life. Contrary to the Republicans’ claims, the agency’s scientists have said there is significant empirical evidence that whales and other marine mammals are being increasingly harmed and killed by collisions with ships, entanglements with fishing gear and as a general result of worsening plastic pollution and global warming.

“At this point, the link between offshore wind surveys and the recent whale deaths is speculative and not supported by scientific literature or other data,” Lauren Gaches, spokesperson for NOAA Fisheries, said in a statement to Inside Climate News. “Since December 1, 2022, injuries consistent with vessel strike were identified in many of the animals necropsied, although confirmation is pending analysis of samples collected during the examination.”

In fact, scientists have been sounding the alarm over surging whale deaths since 2016, suggesting the recent incidents involving beached whales are actually part of a larger trend that began well before any of the East Coast was slated for offshore wind development. In 2017, NOAA declared an “unusual mortality event” for both the North Atlantic right whale and the Atlantic humpback whale—the two species that have been washing up dead along the East Coast in recent months. And many researchers have pointed out that this winter’s slew of whale strandings look strikingly similar to those that occurred from December 2016 through February 2017 in Virginia and North Carolina.

Additionally, while scientists say no single cause is likely to blame, evidence so far overwhelmingly points to increased ship traffic and entanglements with fishing gear as the main culprits. At least 178 humpback whales have died between the coasts of Maine and Florida since 2016. Half of those whales have been necropsied, with 40 percent of those showing evidence that the animal was struck by a vessel or entangled in fishing gear. NOAA found similar evidence for at least 15 right whales during that same timespan. Shipping traffic in the Atlantic Ocean has also jumped 34 percent over the last five years, a 2022 study found.

But that evidence hasn’t stopped mounting opposition to U.S. offshore wind farms, some of which is being funded by the fossil fuel industry, according to recent reports from HuffPost and Fast Company. The issue has been especially problematic when it comes to online disinformation about wind energy, experts have warned.

According to a new report by Media Matters, a progressive watchdog group, posts about wind energy on Facebook between January and March of this year were dominated by right-leaning political groups and conservative media outlets, including Fox News, that spread misleading or false claims suggesting wind energy was contributing to whale deaths.

Of the 288 posts that mentioned wind energy during those months, nearly 84 percent of them specifically noted the unsubstantiated claim that offshore wind farms impact whale populations, the report said, with none of the posts getting fact-checked by Facebook. It’s the latest report to criticize Big Tech companies for their role in spreading online disinformation—something activists say is now a major barrier to achieving meaningful climate action.

Efforts to deploy both wind and solar energy have ramped up significantly in recent years, driven in large part by recent federal climate policies. As part of his larger aim to slash U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by half in seven years, President Joe Biden has set a goal of deploying 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030. The Inflation Reduction Act also allocates $100 million for offshore wind projects and reopened additional public waters to offshore wind leases in the Gulf of Mexico and along the Atlantic coast.

“This has become the perfect opportunity for anti-renewable activists and fossil fuels industry shills posing as environmentalists sympathetic to the plight of whales to launch a public relations and legal campaign in opposition to these offshore wind projects,” the Media Matters report said. “Right-wing media, and particularly Fox News, have propelled these efforts in response to Biden’s push for offshore wind.”

More Top Climate News

Global Water Crisis Could ‘Spiral Out of Control,’ UN Report Warns: A new report from the United Nations warns of a looming global water crisis that could “spiral out of control” as increased demand for water and the intensifying impacts of the climate crisis put huge pressure on water resources, Sana Noor Haq reports for CNN. The U.N. World Water Development Report, published Tuesday, comes just a day after the global body released a landmark assessment warning that the world was far off track from meeting global climate goals.

Biden Creates Two National Monuments in the Southwest: President Biden on Tuesday designated two new national monuments in the Southwest, insulating from development a half-million acres in Nevada that are revered by Native Americans and 6,600 acres in Texas that were once admired by the writer Jack Kerouac, Coral Davenport reports for the New York Times. The move, celebrated by environmentalists who say the designations were a long time coming, offered a counterbalance to widespread criticism from green groups over President Biden’s decision earlier this month to approve the Willow Project, essentially opening up federal lands in Alaska to new oil and gas drilling.

Climate Change Could Spur Severe Economic Losses, New Federal Report Says: A new annual report from the Biden administration warned that climate change is already causing major economic problems in the United States, Zoya Teirstein reports for Grist. The report challenges previously held assumptions that higher-income countries like the U.S. would safely weather the risks associated with global warming, and that those risks would be clear cut, the administration’s economists wrote.

Today’s Indicator

26 percent

That’s how much of the world’s population lacks access to safe drinking water, according to a grim report from the United Nations released this week. Nearly half of the world’s population also lacks access to basic sanitation that’s taken for granted in Western countries, the report said.

Not a Subscriber?

Update Email Preferences | ICN Newsletter Signup | Unsubscribe

Inside Climate News

26 Court Street

Suite #1617

Brooklyn, NY 11242

Add us to your address book

3/26/23, In California’s Central Valley, the Plan to Build More Solar Faces a Familiar Constraint: The Need for More Power Lines

In California’s Central Valley, the Plan to Build More Solar Faces a Familiar Constraint: The Need for More Power Lines

Web Version | Update preferences | Unsubscribe

In the 03/26/2023 edition:

In California’s Central Valley, the Plan to Build More Solar Faces a Familiar Constraint: The Need for More Power Lines

In California’s Central Valley, the Plan to Build More Solar Faces a Familiar Constraint: The Need for More Power Lines

The state could embrace “policy synergy” to deploy solar in areas transitioning out of agriculture, but the transmission lines must come first.

By Emma Foehringer Merchant

California’s San Joaquin Valley, a strip of land between the Diablo Range and the Sierra Nevada, accounts for a significant portion of the state’s crop production and agricultural revenues. But with the state facing uncertain and uneven water supply due to climate change, some local governments and clean energy advocates hope solar energy installations could provide economic reliability where agriculture falters due to possible water shortages.

Climate Change News

Department of Homeland Security Becomes 14th Member of USGCRP

USGCRP at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting 2022

USGCRP hosting free webinars in support of National Climate Assessment

Fifth National Climate Assessment Update: March 2022

Fifth National Climate Assessment Update: August 2021

USGCRP Welcomes Allison Crimmins as Director of the Fifth National Climate Assessment

Dr. Mike Kuperberg Returns as USGCRP Executive Director

Updates on NCA5

NASA/JPL Sentinel-6 Michael Freilich Satellite Launched

Remembering Dr. Mike Freilich

AI Can Spread Climate Misinformation ‘Much Cheaper and Faster,’ Study Warns

More Top Climate News

Today’s Indicator

Not a Subscriber?

Why Kentucky Is Dead Last for Wind and Solar Production

Why Kentucky Is Dead Last for Wind and Solar Production

What’s the Future of Gas Stations in an EV World?

What’s the Future of Gas Stations in an EV World?

Go Deeper

Three International Courts Could Soon Rule on the Obligations of Nations in Responding to Climate Change

Corporate Interests ‘Watered Down’ the Latest IPCC Climate Report, Investigations Find

Three International Courts Could Soon Rule on the Obligations of Nations in Responding to Climate Change

Corporate Interests ‘Watered Down’ the Latest IPCC Climate Report, Investigations Find

Corporate Interests ‘Watered Down’ the Latest IPCC Climate Report, Investigations Find

More Top Climate News

Today’s Indicator

Not a Subscriber?

Environmentalists Praise the EPA’s Move to Restrict ‘Forever Chemicals’ in Water and Wonder, What’s Next?

‘Rewilding’ Parts of the Planet Could Have Big Climate Benefits

Environmentalists Praise the EPA’s Move to Restrict ‘Forever Chemicals’ in Water and Wonder, What’s Next?

‘Rewilding’ Parts of the Planet Could Have Big Climate Benefits

In Braddock, Imagining Environmental Justice for a ‘Sacrifice Zone’

In Braddock, Imagining Environmental Justice for a ‘Sacrifice Zone’

Republicans Propose Nationwide Offshore Wind Ban, Citing Unsubstantiated Links to Whale Deaths

More Top Climate News

Today’s Indicator

Not a Subscriber?

In California’s Central Valley, the Plan to Build More Solar Faces a Familiar Constraint: The Need for More Power Lines

In California’s Central Valley, the Plan to Build More Solar Faces a Familiar Constraint: The Need for More Power Lines